Explore Policy Nepal
In editorial reviewNepali translation awaiting review

Floods and landslides in the hills and the Tarai

Which risks should be reduced before the next emergency, and who maintains the protection?

Place-specific evidence and policy choices. A budget promise is not a completed service; older figures retain their reporting period. Proposed options and indicators below are for public discussion, not adopted government commitments.

Contested choiceA regional priority with choices about delivery and fairness

Which risks should be reduced before the next emergency, and who maintains the protection?145

Updated 2026-10-13 · Version 1 · Sources · Change history

Question 1 What is the issue, and why does it matter?

In the September 2024 floods and landslides, Nepal Police data compiled by the disaster authority recorded 121 incidents, 20 deaths and 117 houses destroyed in Koshi (preliminary figures).1

The choice is how to improve outcomes in this province, who benefits first, and which institution can act. The figures below belong to the stated reporting period; they are not a real-time measure of today’s conditions.

Question 2 What do current law and policy say?

Disaster preparedness, rescue, relief and recovery is federal–provincial concurrent (Schedule 7, item 17), a local power (Schedule 8, item 20) and concurrent for all three levels (Schedule 9, item 9).2

Provincial executive power rests with the Council of Ministers. The Chief of Province (governor) performs constitutional and legal functions, generally on the Council’s recommendation and consent; the governor is not the department delivering these services. Provincial revenue and expenditure estimates go to the Provincial Assembly.3

Question 3 What is known, uncertain or disputed?

Known

In the September 2024 floods and landslides, Nepal Police data compiled by the disaster authority recorded 121 incidents, 20 deaths and 117 houses destroyed in Koshi (preliminary figures).1

The federal government declared Ilam district a disaster crisis area for three months after heavy rain on 2082 Asoj 23 (October 2025).4

The FY 2083/84 provincial budget promises disaster-risk mapping, a disaster portal and early-warning work, and allocates Rs 62.53 crore for river control and water-induced disasters.5

Uncertain

A province-wide number does not identify the worst-served wards or prove the same problem in every municipality. Before spending, establish a current local baseline, service quality, staffing, access barriers and the full operating cost.

Disputed

The policy choice is how to balance universal access, concentrated investment, affordability and fiscal sustainability. The alternatives below are Policy Nepal’s discussion options derived from the problem evidence, not claims that officials or parties have endorsed them.

Questions 4–5 What are the options, and what do they cost and achieve?

Options are listed in no particular order. Policy Nepal does not recommend one; real policies often combine them.

Prioritise preparedness and existing assets145

Map exposed settlements and essential facilities; clear drainage, stabilise critical slopes, maintain evacuation routes and practise warnings people can act on.

Benefits
  • Focuses limited resources on reducing exposure and keeping services working.
Costs
  • Risk mapping, local teams, maintenance and accessible warnings require regular funding.
Trade-offs
  • Warnings do not make an unsafe home or road safe; households may need relocation support.
What does implementation require?
  • Assign named offices for each critical asset, test warning reach and publish drill findings without exposing vulnerable households.

Build safer reconstruction and basin-wide protection145

Rebuild to verified safety standards and coordinate river, road and settlement interventions across municipal boundaries.

Benefits
  • Can reduce repeated losses and restore access to schools, clinics and markets.
Costs
  • Requires design review, skilled supervision, land agreements and long-term maintenance.
Trade-offs
  • An embankment can shift flood risk elsewhere; resettlement must protect livelihoods and rights.
What does implementation require?
  • Publish hazard assumptions, affected-household consultation, inspection results and a funded maintenance plan before declaring completion.

Combining options

Start with a verified baseline and maintenance of functioning services, then test additional investment against the same outcomes. Publish who pays for capital costs, recurring costs and any household charges; an unfunded operating plan is not a sustainable solution.

Question 6 Who is responsible?

Shared
Disaster risk

Disaster preparedness, rescue, relief and recovery is federal–provincial concurrent (Schedule 7, item 17), a local power (Schedule 8, item 20) and concurrent for all three levels (Schedule 9, item 9).2

Provincial
Chief Minister, Council of Ministers and Provincial Assembly

Provincial executive power rests with the Council of Ministers. The Chief of Province (governor) performs constitutional and legal functions, generally on the Council’s recommendation and consent; the governor is not the department delivering these services. Provincial revenue and expenditure estimates go to the Provincial Assembly.3

Question 7 What have parties and leaders said and done?

What was said or promised is shown apart from what was recorded as done. Every entry needs a dated source. A missing entry means the position is not established, not that someone opposes or is neutral.

This dossier presents official evidence and research options. It does not assign a position to a chief minister, governor, mayor or political party without a dated source specific to this issue.

Said or promised

Position not established in reviewed sources.

Recorded actions and outcomes

Position not established in reviewed sources.

Question 8 What would progress look like, and when do we check again?

IndicatorLatest official figureOfficial targetRevisit
Warning reach and time to restore essential services after an event145 Not established No official target found 2026-10-20
Risk-reduction assets inspected and maintained before the hazard season145 Not established No official target found 2026-10-20

Sources

Grouped by type of evidence. Government plans show what government intends; they are not proof of results. Party material shows what a party says.

Constitution & law

  1. The Constitution of Nepal (English translation, incl. first and second amendments), Schedules 5–9 — Nepal Law Commission, Government of Nepal, Gazette publication 20 September 2015 (2072/06/03); amended 2016 and 2020. Schedule 5 (federal powers), pp. 193–195; Schedule 6 (provincial powers), pp. 196–197; Schedule 7 (federal–provincial concurrent powers), pp. 198–199; Schedule 8 (local powers), pp. 200–201; Schedule 9 (concurrent powers of all three levels), p. 202. Item numbers are given in each statement that cites this source.. Checked 2026-10-11
  2. Constitution of Nepal, English translation with first and second amendments — Nepal Law Commission. Articles 162, 166, 207–208; Schedules 6–9. English translation; Nepali text authoritative.. Checked 2026-10-13

Government plans & policy

  1. आर्थिक वर्ष २०८३/८४ को बजेट वक्तव्य (Budget statement FY 2083/84), presented by Minister Bidur Kumar Linthep — Ministry of Economic Affairs and Planning, Koshi Province, 2083 Asar 1 (15 June 2026). Paras 6–11 (growth, GDP, share of national agricultural production, per capita income, poverty, forest), printed pp. 3–5 (PDF pp. 5–7); para 14 (irrigation), printed p. 6; para 16 (registered small, cottage and micro industries and firms), printed p. 7; para 18 (net enrolment), printed pp. 7–8; para 19 (spending to end of Baisakh 2083), printed pp. 8–9; challenges list (क)–(झ), printed pp. 10–12; para 36 (disaster mapping and early warning), printed p. 20; para 55 (people's hydropower), printed p. 26; para 60 (river control), printed p. 29; paras 69, 71–75 (tourism), printed pp. 33–36; paras 106–107, 110 (agriculture), printed pp. 46–48; para 136 (budget size and composition), printed p. 56; para 137 (sources), printed p. 57; paras 146, 150–151 (land-registration fee concessions), printed pp. 61–63. Checked 2026-10-11

Official data

  1. A Preliminary Loss and Damage Assessment of Flood and Landslide, September 2024 — National Disaster Risk Reduction and Management Authority, Ministry of Home Affairs, 28 October 2024. p. 13 (Kathmandu Valley flooding; rapid urban growth and inadequate drainage), PDF p. 16; p. 17 (Nepal Police province table: incidents, deaths, missing, injured, houses destroyed; Bagmati 208 of 238 deaths, Koshi 20, Madhesh 8), PDF p. 20; district house-damage table (Kavrepalanchok 3,121 fully destroyed houses), PDF p. 23. Checked 2026-10-11
  2. मनसुन २०८२ को अवस्था प्रतिवेदन (Monsoon 2082 Situation Report) — National Disaster Risk Reduction and Management Authority, Ministry of Home Affairs, Covers 2082 Jestha 15 – Asoj 24; posted 11 November 2025. p. 1 (Madhesh Province declared a disaster crisis area for drought on 2082 Saun 8; Ilam district declared on 2082 Asoj 23). Checked 2026-10-11
Change history
  1. 2026-10-13 — Expanded the province challenge into the same eight-question format as national issues. (Regional issues deserve equally accessible evidence, options, responsibilities and tracking. Original dates and sources retained; policy options are editorial proposals.)