Explore Policy Nepal
In editorial reviewNepali translation awaiting review

Public money, completed services and audit follow-up

What do Kathmandu Metropolitan City’s own budget and audit records establish, and how can residents check what their money delivers?

Place-specific evidence and policy choices. A budget promise is not a completed service; older figures retain their reporting period. Proposed options and indicators below are for public discussion, not adopted government commitments.

Contested choiceLocal delivery and accountability

How can public money produce completed, usable services and a clear audit trail?13

Updated 2026-10-13 · Version 1 · Sources · Change history

Question 1 What is the issue, and why does it matter?

For FY 2081/82, the Auditor General’s Annex 21 records questioned amounts (beruju) of NPR 619,763 thousand for this city. The report’s unit is thousands of rupees. Beruju can require recovery, documentation or approval, or settlement of overdue advances; it is not by itself a finding of theft or loss.1

Residents need to distinguish an allocation, a payment, a completed asset and a functioning public service. This dossier uses this city’s records, not a provincial average or a ranking of mayors.

Question 2 What do current law and policy say?

The Constitution assigns local executive power to the municipal or village executive and local law-making to its assembly. Local taxation must follow law, and revenue and expenditure estimates must be presented to the assembly. Schedule 8 lists local powers; Schedule 9 includes shared powers. A mayor cannot alone replace these budget, law-making and accountability processes.2

Question 3 What is known, uncertain or disputed?

Known

For FY 2081/82, the Auditor General’s Annex 21 records questioned amounts (beruju) of NPR 619,763 thousand for this city. The report’s unit is thousands of rupees. Beruju can require recovery, documentation or approval, or settlement of overdue advances; it is not by itself a finding of theft or loss.1

For FY 2080/81, the Auditor General’s Annex 21 records questioned amounts (beruju) of NPR 680,236 thousand for this city. The report’s unit is thousands of rupees. Beruju can require recovery, documentation or approval, or settlement of overdue advances; it is not by itself a finding of theft or loss.3

Nepal Electricity Authority audit: of Rs 7.73 arba in street-light arrears owed to the Authority, Rs 1.99 arba was owed by Kathmandu Metropolitan City and remained to be recovered.1

Nepal Trust audit: under a lease agreed on 8 Chaitra 2079 for the 'Kathmandu Plaza' building and land at Kamaladi, the city owed Rs 6.6428 crore in rent up to the end of Asar 2082 and had paid Rs 6.0793 crore, leaving Rs 56.35 lakh to be recovered.1

Nepal Trust (previous year): the city's net rent due for Kathmandu Plaza up to the end of Asar 2081 was Rs 7.9112 crore; it had paid Rs 2.8212 crore (on 14 Kartik 2080), leaving Rs 5.09 crore to be recovered.3

Hanuman Dhoka Durbar Museum Development Committee: the city raised the foreign-visitor entry fee (Rs 150 to Rs 500 for SAARC visitors, Rs 750 to Rs 1,000 for others) in its Finance Act 2081, but the committee's share was not raised in proportion; on that basis the city had not deposited Rs 3.0772 crore up to the end of Asar 2082 into the committee's account.1

Hanuman Dhoka committee (previous year): at the original sharing rates, Rs 1.2995 crore in service fees owed by the city to the committee up to the end of Asar 2081 remained unpaid.3

Local revenue audit sample: Kathmandu and Lalitpur metropolitan cities set land tax (malpot) by classifying land.1

Uncertain

The latest settlement of each audit observation, the condition of every completed asset and current service quality are not established by the annual totals alone. Missing or partial audit coverage must not be treated as zero irregularities.

Disputed

The practical choices are which unfinished works deserve completion, which charges are affordable and lawful, and whether new construction is more valuable than maintaining existing services. These are policy questions, not allegations against an office holder.

Questions 4–5 What are the options, and what do they cost and achieve?

Options are listed in no particular order. Policy Nepal does not recommend one; real policies often combine them.

Repair delivery and accounting before expanding projects13

Publish the status of existing commitments, procurements, unpaid liabilities and audit observations, then fund completion of viable works and resolve documentation gaps.

Benefits
  • Makes unfinished work and unresolved observations visible without treating every irregularity as corruption.
Costs
  • Requires technical staff, reliable asset and contract registers, and timely accounts.
Trade-offs
  • Stopping weak projects can be politically difficult; faster spending is not necessarily better value.
What does implementation require?
  • Assign each observation to an accountable office, record recovery or regularisation separately, and publish completion evidence alongside expenditure.

Improve project selection and realistic revenue planning13

Choose projects with designs, land arrangements, procurement readiness and operating budgets; base revenue estimates on collectable resources and legal tax powers.

Benefits
  • Can reduce abandoned assets, overlapping schemes and mid-year funding gaps.
Costs
  • Preparation and appraisal require upfront staff time and funding.
Trade-offs
  • Stronger own revenue must not impose arbitrary fees or exclude poor households from essential services.
What does implementation require?
  • Publish appraisal criteria, approved budgets and quarterly physical progress; compare like-for-like fiscal years and mark partial audits.

Combining options

Combine realistic revenue estimates, transparent project selection, functioning services and a dated audit-resolution register. Do not use a lower beruju percentage alone as proof of better governance when audit coverage, accounting scope or the denominator differs.

Question 6 Who is responsible?

Local
Municipal executive and municipal assembly

The Constitution assigns local executive power to the municipal or village executive and local law-making to its assembly. Local taxation must follow law, and revenue and expenditure estimates must be presented to the assembly. Schedule 8 lists local powers; Schedule 9 includes shared powers. A mayor cannot alone replace these budget, law-making and accountability processes.2

Independent body
Office of the Auditor General

The cited annual reports provide the audit findings used here. Settlement must be checked against later official records; the city’s own reply and the auditor’s finding should remain distinguishable.13

Question 7 What have parties and leaders said and done?

What was said or promised is shown apart from what was recorded as done. Every entry needs a dated source. A missing entry means the position is not established, not that someone opposes or is neutral.

Budget statements are government proposals or appropriations; they are not a performance endorsement. No party or individual position is inferred from these accounting records.

Said or promised

Position not established in reviewed sources.

Recorded actions and outcomes

Position not established in reviewed sources.

Question 8 What would progress look like, and when do we check again?

IndicatorLatest official figureOfficial targetRevisit
Completed and functioning projects compared with money spent13 Not established No official target found 2026-10-20
Audit observations resolved by recovery, regularisation or advance settlement13 Not established No official target found 2026-10-20

Sources

Grouped by type of evidence. Government plans show what government intends; they are not proof of results. Party material shows what a party says.

Constitution & law

  1. Constitution of Nepal, English translation with first and second amendments — Nepal Law Commission. Articles 214, 221, 228–230; Schedules 8 and 9. English translation; Nepali text authoritative.. Checked 2026-10-13

Official data

  1. महालेखापरीक्षकको त्रिसट्ठिऔँ वार्षिक प्रतिवेदन, २०८३ (63rd Annual Report of the Auditor General, 2083; audit of FY 2081/82) — Office of the Auditor General, Nepal. Local level chapter, revenue review para 6.3, printed p.648 (PDF p.684). Checked 2026-10-11
  2. महालेखापरीक्षकको बासट्ठीऔँ वार्षिक प्रतिवेदन, २०८२ (62nd Annual Report of the Auditor General, 2082; audit of FY 2080/81) — Office of the Auditor General, Nepal. Culture, Tourism and Civil Aviation chapter, para 64, printed p.559 (PDF p.589). Checked 2026-10-11
Change history
  1. 2026-10-13 — Created a local issue dossier from this city’s dated budget and audit evidence. (Use the national eight-question structure at local level; retain missing/partial-audit caveats and distinguish policy options from official commitments.)